Showing posts with label lab-grown diamond producer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lab-grown diamond producer. Show all posts

Friday, 11 September 2026

Lab-Grown Diamonds: Is the Era of Falling Prices Coming to an End?

 Rising production costs, energy consumption and shrinking margins could change the economics of the lab-grown diamond industry

Rising production costs, energy consumption and shrinking margins could change the economics of the lab-grown diamond industry

For several years, the lab-grown diamond industry has been defined by one dominant story: falling prices.

What was once promoted as a lower-cost alternative to natural diamonds has become dramatically cheaper as manufacturers around the world expanded production capacity. In India, which has become one of the world’s major lab-grown diamond manufacturing and polishing centres, the rapid growth in production has created intense competition and severe pressure on margins.

But the economics of the industry may now be reaching an important turning point.

Recent developments in Surat suggest that manufacturers and traders are increasingly concerned that prices and discounts have fallen too far.

At a meeting of the Surat Lab Grown Diamond Association on September 7, industry participants called for greater discipline in pricing and an end to aggressive discounting. Reports from India said polished lab-grown diamond prices had recently increased by approximately 20% to 25%, while traders were reducing discounts from around 7% to approximately 3% to 4%.

This does not necessarily mean that lab-grown diamond prices are about to return to previous levels.

Instead, it may signal something more fundamental: the industry is beginning to confront the cost of actually producing a diamond.

A decade of falling prices

The scale of the price decline has been extraordinary.

According to data reported by the Times of India, India’s average export value for polished lab-grown diamonds fell from approximately US$246 per carat in 2016–17 to around US$60 per carat in 2025–26.

During 2025–26, India exported approximately 18.8 million carats of polished lab-grown diamonds, up substantially in volume, while the total export value fell to approximately US$1.133 billion.

That means the industry was producing and exporting significantly more diamonds while receiving considerably less per carat.

The same report found that the average export value had improved to almost US$69 per carat during April and May 2026, suggesting that the long decline may have started to stabilise.

The latest developments in Surat provide another indication that the market may be attempting to establish a floor.

The problem with selling below cost

The Surat Lab Grown Diamond Association has warned that excessive discounting is damaging manufacturers’ earnings.

Association president Babu Vaghani reportedly said that continued price reductions were reducing manufacturers’ profits and putting pressure on wages.

The concern is straightforward.

A diamond manufacturer has to pay for:

  • sophisticated growing equipment
  • electricity
  • cooling systems
  • gases such as hydrogen and methane for CVD production
  • diamond seed plates
  • maintenance
  • skilled technicians
  • factory buildings
  • financing and equipment depreciation
  • cutting and polishing
  • grading and certification
  • rejected or lower-quality production
  • logistics and administration

If the finished diamond is continually sold for less, eventually something has to give.

Manufacturers can reduce margins, reduce wages, reduce investment, reduce production or leave the industry altogether.

Reports from Surat indicate that some polishing units have already considered moving into other industries as prolonged price erosion has reduced earnings and contributed to skilled-worker shortages.

Energy: the hidden cost of a laboratory diamond

One of the most important factors in understanding the future cost of lab-grown diamonds is energy.

Lab-grown diamonds are not simply manufactured like an ordinary consumer product. They are grown under highly controlled conditions using enormous amounts of technology, heat, pressure, vacuum systems, plasma and cooling.

There are two principal technologies used to grow gem-quality laboratory diamonds: HPHT, or High Pressure High Temperature, and CVD, or Chemical Vapour Deposition.

DCLA’s information on synthetic diamonds and laboratory-grown diamond certification explains the technologies used to produce laboratory-grown diamonds and the importance of identifying their origin.

The Gemological Institute of America explains that HPHT involves temperatures of approximately 1,300°C to 1,600°C and pressures exceeding 870,000 pounds per square inch. CVD uses a vacuum chamber, gases and an energy source to create a plasma in which carbon atoms are deposited onto diamond seed plates.

For CVD production in particular, electricity is a critical ongoing input because the reactor, plasma generation, vacuum equipment, pumps and cooling systems must operate for extended periods.

Research into synthetic diamond production has identified electricity as a major environmental and production hotspot for microwave-CVD manufacturing.

The exact electricity consumption varies considerably depending on equipment, efficiency, production scale, cooling systems and operating conditions. Published estimates range from several dozen kilowatt-hours per carat to substantially more in less-efficient systems.

One recent technical analysis estimates modern HPHT production at around 36 kWh per carat under particular operating conditions, while CVD systems can vary substantially, with some commercial systems using around 77 kWh per carat and less-efficient systems exceeding 200 kWh per carat. These figures should be treated as indicative rather than a universal industry standard.

The important point is not one particular number.

It is that electricity is a recurring cost for every diamond produced.

Once a manufacturing plant has been built, the machines still have to run.

Why energy could become a price driver

This is where the economics become particularly interesting.

The initial investment in a laboratory-grown diamond factory is largely a capital cost. The manufacturer buys reactors, presses, vacuum equipment, cooling systems, power infrastructure and other machinery.

Once the factory is operating, however, the manufacturer faces continuing costs.

Electricity is one of them.

Unlike the purchase of a machine, electricity cannot be depreciated away. Every production cycle consumes power.

That means energy prices can have a direct effect on the minimum economic price at which a manufacturer can operate.

If electricity prices increase, production costs rise.

If manufacturers are already operating on very small margins, they may have little ability to absorb those increases.

The effect can be particularly significant for producers using electricity-intensive CVD or HPHT systems for long production cycles.

This creates an important potential turning point for the lab-grown diamond industry.

The lower the selling price becomes, the more important the underlying production cost becomes.

At some point, manufacturers have to decide whether producing another carat is economically worthwhile.

The economics of oversupply

The spectacular fall in lab-grown diamond prices was not caused simply by consumers suddenly deciding that diamonds were worth less.

A major factor has been the expansion of production capacity.

India alone produced more than 3 million lab-grown diamonds in 2023 and accounted for more than 15% of global output, according to India’s NITI Aayog.

Other major production centres, particularly China, also expanded capacity.

The result was a classic supply-and-demand problem.

When production capacity grows faster than consumer demand, manufacturers compete for buyers.

One manufacturer reduces its price.

Another offers a discount.

A trader offers an additional discount.

A broker undercuts another broker.

The process can continue until the market price is significantly below the level manufacturers originally expected.

This is precisely why the recent call from Surat for an end to excessive discounting is significant.

The industry is effectively saying that price competition has gone too far.

DCLA has previously examined this broader transformation in the diamond industry in its article on lab-grown diamonds as a structural disruption to the traditional diamond industry.

The cost floor

Every manufactured product has an economic cost floor.

That does not mean prices can never fall below the cost of production. Companies can sell inventory at a loss, factories can operate below capacity and distressed businesses can liquidate stock.

But those conditions cannot continue indefinitely.

If manufacturers consistently lose money, production capacity eventually disappears.

Machines are switched off.

Investment stops.

Workers leave.

Companies close or move into other businesses.

Supply then begins to contract.

This is potentially what the lab-grown diamond industry is now trying to avoid.

The Times of India reported that persistent price erosion has already forced some polishing units to consider alternative industries and has placed pressure on wages.

Could this lead to higher lab-grown diamond prices?

Possibly — but it is important not to confuse a price stabilisation with a return to the prices of several years ago.

There are still enormous production capacities around the world, and technological improvements can continue to reduce manufacturing costs.

Competition also remains intense.

However, the recent 20% to 25% reported increase in polished prices in Surat, combined with the reduction in discounts from approximately 7% to 3%–4%, suggests that parts of the industry are already attempting to establish greater pricing discipline.

If manufacturers continue to reduce production, consolidate capacity or refuse to sell below sustainable levels, prices could eventually find a stronger floor.

Energy costs could become an important part of that floor.

Why energy matters more as prices fall

There is an interesting economic paradox here.

When lab-grown diamonds were expensive, energy represented only one component of a much larger selling price.

As the selling price falls dramatically, however, every operating cost becomes proportionally more important.

Imagine a manufacturer producing a diamond at a total cost of $100 per carat.

Selling it for $200 leaves room for overheads, financing and profit.

Selling it for $120 leaves very little.

Selling it for $90 creates a loss.

The actual numbers vary enormously between manufacturers, technologies, electricity prices, yields and diamond specifications. Therefore, there is no single industry-wide production cost that can be applied to every lab-grown diamond.

But the economic principle remains the same.

There is a point at which further price reductions stop being sustainable.

The next phase of the lab-grown diamond market

The laboratory-grown diamond industry may therefore be entering a different phase.

The first phase was technological.

Could diamonds be grown commercially in laboratories?

The second phase was expansion.

How quickly could manufacturers increase production?

The third phase was price competition.

How cheaply could those diamonds be sold?

The next phase may be about economics.

How cheaply can a diamond realistically be produced while still providing a sustainable return to the manufacturer?

That question could become increasingly important.

The industry has already demonstrated that laboratory-grown diamonds can be produced at dramatically lower prices than natural diamonds.

What it has not yet demonstrated is where the long-term sustainable price floor lies.

Energy will be one of the factors determining that answer.

So will equipment depreciation, financing, labour, gases, seeds, yields, polishing, grading and the cost of maintaining sophisticated manufacturing facilities.

What this means for consumers

For consumers, lower lab-grown diamond prices have been an obvious advantage.

They have made larger and higher-specification diamonds accessible to a much wider market.

But consumers should also understand that cheap does not necessarily mean the price cannot fall further — and it does not mean the price cannot eventually rise.

The current market is still evolving.

The recent developments in Surat suggest that manufacturers are increasingly unwilling to continue absorbing falling margins and aggressive discounts.

If production is reduced and pricing discipline improves, the market could begin to stabilise.

If energy and other operating costs rise at the same time, those costs could become increasingly important in determining the minimum sustainable price of a lab-grown diamond.

The DCLA view

For consumers, the most important point remains understanding exactly what they are buying.

A laboratory-grown diamond is a real diamond with essentially the same chemical composition and crystal structure as a natural diamond, but its origin is different.

DCLA’s recent article, Natural or Laboratory-Grown? How Can You Tell What Diamond Is in Your Ring?, explains why laboratory-grown and natural diamonds can be difficult to distinguish visually and why independent laboratory testing is important.

DCLA recommends independent diamond identification and certification where appropriate, particularly when establishing whether a diamond is natural or laboratory-grown.

The DCLA Diamond Grading Report records important characteristics including carat weight, colour, clarity, measurements, treatments and whether the diamond is natural or laboratory-grown.

The laboratory-grown diamond industry has undergone an extraordinary period of technological development and price compression.

The next question is whether it can achieve something arguably more difficult:

long-term economic stability.

If manufacturers can no longer operate profitably at today’s heavily discounted prices, and if energy and other production costs continue to rise, the economics of the industry suggest that prices may eventually have to move higher or production capacity will have to contract.

The recent events in Surat may be an early indication that this process has already begun.

Friday, 31 July 2026

Could Diamonds Follow the Pearl Industry? Lessons from One of Jewellery's Greatest Transformations

 Could Diamonds Follow the Pearl Industrym, When Nature Could No Longer Meet Demand

For more than a century, natural diamonds have represented rarity, permanence and prestige. Yet today, the diamond industry is experiencing one of the most significant periods of change in its history. The rapid rise of laboratory-grown diamonds has challenged long-held assumptions about rarity, value and production.

While many compare laboratory-grown diamonds to synthetic gemstones, perhaps a more relevant comparison lies elsewhere. The transformation of the pearl industry offers an intriguing historical precedent.

Could diamonds be following a similar path?

When Nature Could No Longer Meet Demand

Before the early twentieth century, every pearl was natural.

Finding a single fine pearl required divers to open thousands of wild oysters, making exceptional pearls extraordinarily rare and valuable. As demand increased, natural oyster beds became depleted through over-harvesting, pollution and environmental change. The jewellery market faced an obvious problem: consumers wanted pearls, but nature simply could not supply them in sufficient quantity.

The solution came through cultured pearls.

By introducing a tiny nucleus into a living oyster, pearl farmers could encourage the oyster to produce a genuine pearl under controlled conditions. The process still relied on nature, but it dramatically increased consistency, availability and affordability.

Initially, cultured pearls were met with scepticism. Many believed they would destroy the value of natural pearls.

Instead, something quite different happened.

Two Markets Emerged

Rather than replacing natural pearls entirely, cultured pearls created an entirely new market.

Millions of consumers who had never been able to afford fine pearls suddenly could.

Natural pearls, however, became even rarer. As natural harvesting declined, truly exceptional natural pearls became increasingly desirable to collectors, museums and high-end jewellery houses.

Today, important natural pearl necklaces regularly achieve extraordinary auction results because of their rarity and historical significance.

The market effectively separated into two distinct categories:

  • Cultured pearls became the mainstream jewellery product.
  • Natural pearls became exceptional collector’s items.

Both markets survived—but they served different customers.

Diamonds May Be Facing a Similar Evolution

When Nature Could No Longer Meet Demand Before the early twentieth century, every pearl was natural.


Laboratory-grown diamonds are not imitation diamonds.

They possess the same crystal structure, chemical composition and optical properties as natural diamonds. Modern technology can produce exceptionally high-quality stones in a matter of weeks rather than over billions of years beneath the Earth’s surface.

Production efficiencies continue to improve.

Prices have fallen dramatically.

Quality has become increasingly consistent.

For many jewellery buyers, laboratory-grown diamonds offer larger sizes and higher specifications at significantly lower prices than natural diamonds.

This has fundamentally changed the entry-level diamond jewellery market.

The Difference is Rarity

Where the comparison becomes interesting is the concept of rarity.

Natural diamonds are finite geological creations formed over billions of years under immense heat and pressure.

Laboratory-grown diamonds can be manufactured repeatedly whenever production facilities are expanded.

This distinction mirrors the difference between natural and cultured pearls.

One derives its rarity from nature.

The other derives its availability from technology.

Neither is inherently “better” in every situation they simply satisfy different consumer priorities.

Luxury Has Always Valued Scarcity

History shows that luxury markets rarely disappear simply because a more affordable alternative becomes available.

Mechanical watches continue to thrive despite the accuracy of digital watches.

Original artworks remain valuable despite the existence of perfect reproductions.

Vintage wines command remarkable prices despite modern winemaking techniques.

Natural pearls retained their prestige after cultured pearls became mainstream.

Collectors often place a premium on objects that cannot simply be reproduced.

The same principle may continue to apply to exceptional natural diamonds.

Large, rare coloured diamonds, historically significant gemstones and stones with remarkable provenance are unlikely to lose their appeal simply because laboratory-grown diamonds become increasingly common.

Will Natural Diamonds Become More Exclusive?

As mining becomes more challenging and fewer new diamond deposits are discovered, the supply of natural diamonds may gradually tighten.

Several major mines are approaching the end of their productive lives, while fewer world-class discoveries have been made over the past two decades.

If production continues to decline while the finest stones remain desirable, natural diamonds could increasingly occupy a position similar to that of natural pearls—less common, more exclusive and primarily sought by collectors and connoisseurs.

Rather than competing directly with laboratory-grown diamonds, they may simply occupy a different market.

What Happens to Everyday Diamond Jewellery?

This may be where laboratory-grown diamonds reshape the industry most dramatically.

Consumers purchasing jewellery primarily for its appearance, design or sentimental value may increasingly choose laboratory-grown diamonds because they provide greater size and quality within a given budget.

Jewellery designers gain greater creative freedom.

Consumers gain more choice.

The overall market for diamond jewellery could even expand as affordability improves.

This is remarkably similar to what occurred with cultured pearls, which transformed pearls from an occasional luxury into an everyday jewellery category.

The Importance of Transparency

One lesson from the pearl industry is particularly relevant.

Consumers accepted cultured pearls because the industry clearly distinguished them from natural pearls.

Each category developed its own identity.

The same principle is essential for diamonds.

Natural and laboratory-grown diamonds are both genuine diamonds, but they have different origins, different rarity profiles and different market dynamics.

Clear disclosure, accurate grading and transparent terminology allow consumers to make informed purchasing decisions based on their own priorities rather than confusion or marketing.

The Future May Not Be Either-Or

The history of jewellery suggests that technological innovation rarely eliminates natural luxury products.

Instead, it often creates broader markets with distinct categories serving different needs.

Natural pearls and cultured pearls now coexist successfully.

It is entirely possible that natural and laboratory-grown diamonds will do the same.

Natural diamonds may increasingly represent geological rarity, heritage and long-term collectability.

Laboratory-grown diamonds may continue to dominate fashion jewellery, bridal markets and value-conscious consumers seeking exceptional visual beauty.

Rather than one replacing the other, both could become permanent parts of the modern jewellery landscape.

Conclusion

The transformation of the pearl industry demonstrates that innovation does not necessarily diminish the value of natural treasures. Instead, it can redefine their place within the luxury market.

Whether diamonds ultimately follow the same path remains to be seen, but the parallels are compelling. Laboratory-grown diamonds have undoubtedly changed accessibility and affordability, much as cultured pearls did generations ago.

History suggests that when technology makes luxury more accessible, the rarest natural examples often become even more distinctive.

For the jewellery industry, the future may not be about choosing between natural and laboratory-grown diamonds. Instead, it may be about recognising that each serves a different purpose, a different customer and a different definition of value.

As with pearls, the industry may simply be witnessing the emergence of two complementary markets one built on the rarity of nature, the other on the possibilities of technology.

Source: DCLA

Friday, 8 May 2026

Lab-Grown Diamonds Face Growing Scrutiny Over Massive Energy Use and Carbon Footprint

 

According to Pandora, the new carbon footprint reporting is being introduced in response to increasing consumer expectations to sustainability

While jewellery retailer Pandora has introduced carbon footprint labelling for its laboratory-grown diamonds in response to growing consumer demand for sustainability and transparency, the announcement also highlights an important reality often overlooked in the marketing of synthetic diamonds laboratory-grown diamonds are highly energy-intensive products.

Creating laboratory-grown diamonds requires enormous amounts of electricity to replicate the extreme heat and pressure conditions found deep within the earth. Whether produced through High Pressure High Temperature (HPHT) or Chemical Vapour Deposition (CVD) technology, these processes rely on industrial machinery operating continuously for extended periods, consuming significant energy during crystal growth, cutting and polishing.

Pandora stated that its laboratory-grown diamonds are produced using “100% renewable energy” and claimed their carbon footprint is approximately 90% lower than mined diamonds. However, this depends heavily on the availability, reliability and verification of renewable energy sources, as well as regional electricity grids. In many parts of the world where laboratory-grown diamonds are manufactured, energy generation still relies substantially on fossil fuels, raising ongoing questions about the true environmental impact of mass synthetic diamond production.

The company’s new carbon footprint reporting covers emissions from raw material production through to polishing and has reportedly been verified by external life-cycle assessment experts and reviewed by EY. Pandora says the initiative aims to give consumers greater transparency alongside the traditional 4Cs Cut, Colour, Clarity and Carat by adding what it calls a “5th C” focused on climate impact.

At the same time, the broader diamond industry continues to debate the long-term sustainability claims surrounding laboratory-grown diamonds. Natural diamonds are created by nature over billions of years, while synthetic diamonds require constant industrial energy input to manufacture in controlled factory environments.

As consumer awareness grows, transparency around energy consumption, carbon reporting and manufacturing practices will likely become an increasingly important part of the conversation surrounding both natural and laboratory-grown diamonds.

Source: DCLA

Monday, 23 March 2026

Lab-Grown Diamonds: A Structural Disruption to the Traditional Diamond Industry

 Lab-grown diamonds reshape the industry

The global diamond industry is undergoing one of the most profound transformations in its modern history. The rapid rise of lab-grown diamonds is not merely a cyclical shift it represents a structural disruption that is reshaping mining economics, retail strategies, and long-held consumer perceptions of value.

What makes this transition particularly striking is that it was not unforeseen. As early as 2002, Diamond Certification Laboratory of Australia (DCLA) issued clear warnings to the Australian diamond industry about the impending impact of synthetic diamonds. Yet, industry associations largely failed to act, leaving miners, wholesalers, and retailers exposed to a technological shift that is now impossible to ignore.


A Warning Ignored: DCLA’s Early Insight

More than two decades ago, DCLA identified that advances in diamond-growing technology particularly Chemical Vapour Deposition (CVD) and High-Pressure High-Temperature (HPHT) would eventually produce gem-quality diamonds indistinguishable from natural stones without specialised equipment.

At the time, the broader industry dismissed these developments as niche or irrelevant to the emotional and luxury positioning of natural diamonds. Industry bodies continued to promote rarity, tradition, and romance, rather than preparing for a future where functional equivalence meets dramatic price advantage.

The failure was not technological it was strategic.

No meaningful contingency planning was undertaken. There was no large-scale consumer education framework, no segmentation strategy, and no defensive positioning to preserve the long-term value of natural diamonds. The result is the dislocation we are witnessing today.


Technological Parity and Economic Reality

Lab-grown diamonds are, from a scientific standpoint, diamonds in every sense. They possess identical:

  • Hardness (10 on the Mohs scale)
  • Refractive index
  • Thermal conductivity
  • Crystal structure

The only difference lies in origin.

Modern production methods have compressed what takes nature billions of years into a matter of weeks. CVD grows diamonds atom by atom in controlled environments, while HPHT replicates the extreme pressure and heat conditions found deep within the Earth.

This technological leap has created a fundamental economic imbalance:

  • 1-carat lab-grown diamond: $800–$1,500
  • 1-carat natural diamond: $4,000–$8,000

An 80%+ price differential for a visually identical product is not a temporary inefficiency—it is a permanent market force.


Impact on Traditional Mining

The implications for mining companies are severe and ongoing.

Major producers, including De Beers (owned by Anglo American), have experienced dramatic valuation declines and sustained financial pressure. Falling polished diamond prices—down more than 40% from recent peaks—are compressing margins across the sector.

Unlike synthetic producers, miners cannot rapidly adjust supply or significantly reduce extraction costs. Their operations are capital intensive, geographically fixed, and subject to long development cycles.

This has led to:

  • Mine closures and production cuts
  • Asset write-downs
  • Consolidation across the industry
  • Reduced exploration investment

The traditional model—built on scarcity and controlled supply—is being undermined by a product that can be manufactured at scale.


Retailers Caught in the Middle

Diamond retailers have arguably been hit the hardest.

For decades, retailers relied on consistent pricing structures, stable supply chains, and the emotional narrative of natural diamonds. Today, they face a vastly more complex landscape:

  • Consumers are more informed and price-sensitive
  • Lab-grown diamonds offer higher margins but lower ticket values
  • Natural diamonds face resale and perception challenges
  • Inventory risk has increased significantly

Retailers must now walk a fine line—offering both products while clearly communicating the differences. Failure to do so risks eroding consumer trust.

Many have pivoted toward lab-grown diamonds due to demand, but this shift often comes at the expense of the very product category that built their business.


Changing Consumer Psychology

Perhaps the most significant shift is not technological—but psychological.

Younger consumers increasingly prioritise:

  • Value for money
  • Ethical sourcing
  • Environmental considerations
  • Transparency

The traditional narrative—“a diamond is forever”—no longer carries the same weight it once did.

Instead, buyers are asking practical questions:

  • Why pay significantly more for a natural stone?
  • What is the resale value?
  • Is the origin worth the premium?

This change in mindset has accelerated lab-grown adoption, particularly in engagement rings, where they now account for nearly half of purchases in key markets.


Environmental Considerations

Lab-grown diamonds have also gained traction through environmental positioning.

While the full lifecycle impact varies depending on energy sources, synthetic diamonds generally offer:

  • Lower land disruption
  • Reduced water usage
  • Less waste generation

Natural diamond mining, by contrast, involves significant earth movement, long-term environmental management, and complex logistics.

However, it is important to note that not all lab-grown diamonds are environmentally equal—production powered by fossil fuels can offset many of these advantages.


Industry Response: Too Little, Too Late?

Traditional players have responded with a mix of strategies:

  • Emphasising rarity and natural origin
  • Investing in traceability and certification
  • Targeting high-value, large-stone segments
  • Strengthening luxury branding

Yet these responses are largely reactive.

Had the industry heeded DCLA’s early warnings in 2002, it could have:

  • Established clear market segmentation early
  • Educated consumers proactively
  • Protected natural diamond positioning
  • Developed stronger resale and investment frameworks

Instead, the industry allowed the narrative to be rewritten by price and accessibility.


The Road Ahead: Coexistence or Displacement?

The most likely outcome is not total replacement, but market bifurcation:

  • Natural diamonds: Premium, rare, investment-oriented
  • Lab-grown diamonds: Accessible, mass-market, value-driven

However, this coexistence depends on the natural diamond industry’s ability to redefine its value proposition beyond aesthetics.

Without that, the pressure from lab-grown alternatives will only intensify.


The rise of lab-grown diamonds is a textbook case of technological disruption—where innovation delivers a product of equal function at a fraction of the cost.

The tragedy for the traditional diamond industry is not that it was disrupted, but that it was warned.

The Diamond Certification Laboratory of Australia saw the shift coming over 20 years ago. The failure of industry associations to act on that warning has left miners and retailers scrambling to adapt in real time.

For investors, retailers, and consumers alike, the lesson is clear:

In markets driven by both emotion and economics, technology will always find a way to challenge tradition.


Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Market conditions and industry dynamics may change, and readers should conduct independent research before making any decisions.

Natural Diamond Prices Begin to Stabilise, But Has the Market Turned?

After several challenging years for the natural diamond industry, there are growing signs that the market may finally be reaching a period o...