Wednesday 19 February 2020

Retail margins could be boosting man-made diamond sales


Lower prices and marketed ethical and sustainable benefits relative to that of natural diamonds has been the prominent narrative around man-made diamonds, but a seemingly less obvious factor is also likely helping to drive the product: the profit margin they offer retailers.
When analysing the wholesale and retail prices of unbranded man-made and natural diamonds, it appears that the retail gross margin of man-made diamonds in popular carat-sizes is as much as 1.8-times that of natural diamonds.
To further quantify this, for example, in some cases a retailer would theoretically only have to sell US$5,000 worth of man-made diamonds to generate the same gross profit as selling almost $10,000 worth of equivalent natural diamonds. Here, “gross margin” is considered to be a retailer’s top-line profit when selling a diamond, that is the sales price relative to the wholesale cost of the diamond.
This is an important metric for a retailer selling both man-made and natural diamonds because the theoretical high gross profit margin of man-made diamonds serves as an implied incentivise to prioritise selling man-made diamonds over natural, as long as the profit margin differential remains in place.
Further, given that retailers are the direct point of contact between a consumer and a diamond, retailers may be more inclined to promote the beneficial attributes of a man-made stone over a natural, thereby influencing a customer’s longer-term perception of the products.
Despite the significant growth in the availability of man-made diamond jewellery in recent years, it is estimated that still only one in five diamond retailers in the US carry man-made diamonds; and outside of the US the figure is even (much) smaller.
Further, many of the jewellers and other retailers that do carry man-made diamonds only have limited inventory as customer appetite for the product is tested. This has perhaps allowed the few retailers that do carry man-made diamonds, especially those that are more fully stocked, to charge premiums.
Further, given the relatively lower-production costs of man-made diamonds compared to that of natural (especially notable in larger carat-sizes given that man-made diamonds are a manufactured good), it is theoretically more affordable for the supply chain to offer man-made diamonds to retailers on memo (consignments). With goods on consignment, retailers typically have lower, or zero, inventory capital costs and can therefore be more selective in offering discounts to the consumer, perhaps resulting in more resilient profit margins.
However, going forward, as the man-made diamond jewellery complex matures, as new producers and better production technology increases supply and as more retailers compete downstream, especially those selling unbranded goods, the product will likely become more commoditised. Resultantly, retail margins could erode and eventually fall to within that of natural diamonds or even lower.
Source: DCLA

Retail margins could be boosting man-made diamond sales


Lower prices and marketed ethical and sustainable benefits relative to that of natural diamonds has been the prominent narrative around man-made diamonds, but a seemingly less obvious factor is also likely helping to drive the product: the profit margin they offer retailers.
When analysing the wholesale and retail prices of unbranded man-made and natural diamonds, it appears that the retail gross margin of man-made diamonds in popular carat-sizes is as much as 1.8-times that of natural diamonds.
To further quantify this, for example, in some cases a retailer would theoretically only have to sell US$5,000 worth of man-made diamonds to generate the same gross profit as selling almost $10,000 worth of equivalent natural diamonds. Here, “gross margin” is considered to be a retailer’s top-line profit when selling a diamond, that is the sales price relative to the wholesale cost of the diamond.
This is an important metric for a retailer selling both man-made and natural diamonds because the theoretical high gross profit margin of man-made diamonds serves as an implied incentivise to prioritise selling man-made diamonds over natural, as long as the profit margin differential remains in place.
Further, given that retailers are the direct point of contact between a consumer and a diamond, retailers may be more inclined to promote the beneficial attributes of a man-made stone over a natural, thereby influencing a customer’s longer-term perception of the products.
Despite the significant growth in the availability of man-made diamond jewellery in recent years, it is estimated that still only one in five diamond retailers in the US carry man-made diamonds; and outside of the US the figure is even (much) smaller.
Further, many of the jewellers and other retailers that do carry man-made diamonds only have limited inventory as customer appetite for the product is tested. This has perhaps allowed the few retailers that do carry man-made diamonds, especially those that are more fully stocked, to charge premiums.
Further, given the relatively lower-production costs of man-made diamonds compared to that of natural (especially notable in larger carat-sizes given that man-made diamonds are a manufactured good), it is theoretically more affordable for the supply chain to offer man-made diamonds to retailers on memo (consignments). With goods on consignment, retailers typically have lower, or zero, inventory capital costs and can therefore be more selective in offering discounts to the consumer, perhaps resulting in more resilient profit margins.
However, going forward, as the man-made diamond jewellery complex matures, as new producers and better production technology increases supply and as more retailers compete downstream, especially those selling unbranded goods, the product will likely become more commoditised. Resultantly, retail margins could erode and eventually fall to within that of natural diamonds or even lower.
Source: DCLA

De Beers Adds Grading Specs for Lightbox


Lightbox has added grading information for its synthetic white diamonds in an effort by the De Beers brand to bring further transparency to the lab-grown sector.
The company will provide technical specifications showing the minimum quality of its stones across cut, color, clarity and carat weight, Lightbox said Monday. It will include these descriptions with each white lab-grown diamond it sells, but will not grade each stone individually. The specifications are based on internationally recognized grading standards, the De Beers-owned company noted.
“This new feature is just one more way Lightbox can instill consumer confidence,” the company added.
An infographic with the information is also available on Lightbox’s website. Those specifications list its synthetic white diamonds to be “near colorless” or better, which the company defines as between G to J, meaning only a trained gemologist can detect a trace of color. The stones all have a minimum clarity of VS, and a cut of “very good.” The stones are still priced at $800 per carat.
Lightbox, which De Beers launched in 2018, does not currently intend to offer grading information for its blue or pink lab-grown diamonds.
Source: DCLA

De Beers Adds Grading Specs for Lightbox


Lightbox has added grading information for its synthetic white diamonds in an effort by the De Beers brand to bring further transparency to the lab-grown sector.
The company will provide technical specifications showing the minimum quality of its stones across cut, color, clarity and carat weight, Lightbox said Monday. It will include these descriptions with each white lab-grown diamond it sells, but will not grade each stone individually. The specifications are based on internationally recognized grading standards, the De Beers-owned company noted.
“This new feature is just one more way Lightbox can instill consumer confidence,” the company added.
An infographic with the information is also available on Lightbox’s website. Those specifications list its synthetic white diamonds to be “near colorless” or better, which the company defines as between G to J, meaning only a trained gemologist can detect a trace of color. The stones all have a minimum clarity of VS, and a cut of “very good.” The stones are still priced at $800 per carat.
Lightbox, which De Beers launched in 2018, does not currently intend to offer grading information for its blue or pink lab-grown diamonds.
Source: DCLA

Tuesday 18 February 2020

ALROSA sells 6 carat pink diamond


ALROSA has sold its 6.21-carat cushion cut fancy intense pink purple diamond to Larry West, a New York-based collector of exclusive pink diamonds.
The stone originates from Yakutia, where it was discovered and polished by ALROSA.
For over 40 years, Larry J. West, the owner of New York’s L.J. West Diamonds, has been searching for an extraordinary natural color diamonds. His collection has been featured in Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and at auctions worldwide.
“As global production declines, pink diamonds will become rarer and thus more valuable,” West said in a statement.
To establish provenance, the collector received an electronic passport from ALROSA that includes a detailed visual history of the diamond’s extraction and production, as well as information about the craftsman’s background.
As part of the company’s traceability initiative, a short film is automatically generated on ALROSA’s digital platform based on information about each diamond available for purchase.
In September, ALROSA hosted its annual auction of colored stones in Hong Kong and sold over 200 diamonds. All stones sold at the auction were accompanied by a digital passport that contained information about the diamond’s origin.
Source: DCLA

ALROSA sells 6 carat pink diamond


ALROSA has sold its 6.21-carat cushion cut fancy intense pink purple diamond to Larry West, a New York-based collector of exclusive pink diamonds.
The stone originates from Yakutia, where it was discovered and polished by ALROSA.
For over 40 years, Larry J. West, the owner of New York’s L.J. West Diamonds, has been searching for an extraordinary natural color diamonds. His collection has been featured in Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and at auctions worldwide.
“As global production declines, pink diamonds will become rarer and thus more valuable,” West said in a statement.
To establish provenance, the collector received an electronic passport from ALROSA that includes a detailed visual history of the diamond’s extraction and production, as well as information about the craftsman’s background.
As part of the company’s traceability initiative, a short film is automatically generated on ALROSA’s digital platform based on information about each diamond available for purchase.
In September, ALROSA hosted its annual auction of colored stones in Hong Kong and sold over 200 diamonds. All stones sold at the auction were accompanied by a digital passport that contained information about the diamond’s origin.
Source: DCLA

Gold Demand Lifts Mood at India Jewelry Show


Exhibitors at IIJS Signature in Mumbai expressed confidence India’s wedding tradition and enduring love of gold would help the nation’s jewelry industry overcome its current difficulties.
Economic uncertainty, high gold prices, tight regulation and the outbreak of the coronavirus in China have created challenges for the Indian jewelry sector, traders told Rapaport News during the fair, which ended Sunday at the Bombay Exhibition Centre. But fundamental features of the country’s consumer market should help limit the impact, dealers said.
“Gold prices have always gone up,” said Mitesh Gajera, a director at Laxmi Dia Jewel, a Mumbai-based manufacturer, retailer and wholesaler of jewelry. “Gold is a form of investment for Indian people. People trust in gold prices.”
The yellow metal has gained around 20% in value over the past year as investors view the commodity as a safe haven during global economic uncertainty. While that has dampened Indians’ ability to buy, many consumers still see it as a strong investment and even as a currency, with the price growth sometimes boosting their willingness to splurge before the rate increases further.
“In the middle of the night, if you want money, you can immediately get cash [in exchange for gold],” explained Anand Shah, a jewelry designer and owner of Anand Shah Jewels.
Lower price points
However, a shift by consumers toward pieces with less gold content and thinner profit margins for jewelers have offset the rise in gold demand over the past year, exhibitors said. India’s 12.5% import duty on the precious material has intensified the problem, Shah added. The government’s decision to maintain that rate — as well as a 7.5% levy on polished diamonds — in its annual budget earlier this month disappointed the trade, which had been campaigning for a reduction.
The state of the important bridal market also presents a complex mix of positive and negative trends. Suppliers at IIJS Signature reported a strong wedding period so far, with the season running from November until May, providing selling opportunities at the show.
But while Indian nuptials continue to feature bold displays of expensive jewelry, making it a constant source of demand, wedding budgets have decreased due to the sluggish economy. Diamond consumption has suffered as Indians opt for smaller jewelry, with the average Indian bride now wearing around 15 carats in total weight on her big day, compared with 30 carats two years ago, estimated Hardik Shah, the executive director of BR Designs, a Surat-based jewelry manufacturer and retailer.
Less diamond content
“People who would have bought a 10-carat [total weight] necklace [seven or eight months ago] will now buy 5 carats,” added Rhishabh Solanki, a director at jewelry manufacturer Shashat Impex.
Indians’ sacrifice of diamond quantity has been especially evident in the important southern Indian market — cities such as Chennai, Bangalore and Hyderabad — where the relatively educated population is known for being quality-conscious.
Consumers there are shifting to lower gold weights and fewer diamonds in their wedding jewelry, but aren’t compromising on color and clarity, according to Nilesh Soni, head of marketing for the southern region at Mumbai-based jewelry manufacturer Neo Diamonds. They’re still insisting on D-to-F, VVS diamonds, he observed, noting that his company’s sales at the show were mainly of mid-range wedding necklaces with those specifications, Soni reported.
“[Retailers] wouldn’t buy a very high-range [item] because it may sell or may not,” he explained. “The mid-range is a safe investment.”
Jewelry beats diamonds
Finished-jewelry suppliers accounted for the vast majority of exhibitors at IIJS Signature, and came away happier than the loose-diamond suppliers, of which there were only a handful. Some well-known diamond companies were present but displayed their jewelry instead of loose stones.
“For jewelry, the fair has been fantastic,” noted Hitesh Choksi, a sales executive at Hari Krishna Exports, which used the event to display both its diamonds and its finished jewelry. The company benefited from buyers carrying out their initial inquiries and purchases ahead of the festive season, which begins in August.
Sales of loose stones were more muted, as the Indian diamond market is less focused on domestic shows, Hitesh Choski explained. The goods that did sell were mainly in the 1- to 1.50-carat, I-to-K, VS-to-SI categories, as many buyers were from northern India, where consumers tend to choose larger but lower-quality diamonds, he noted. Another loose-diamond exhibitor reported making no sales across the entire event.
Regulatory creep
Aside from the relatively steep import duties, India’s jewelry industry is struggling with regulations designed to clean up the trade, such as a requirement from January 2021 for all gold to carry a hallmark. This type of restriction favors larger companies, according to Milan Choksi, a partner at Tanvirkumar & Company.
“Organized players get the opportunity to take business from those that cannot [handle] the regulations that you need to comply with,” Milan Choksi said. “There are too many things for a smaller business [to cope with], so they’ve had to drop parts of their business. These areas are available for us to capture.”
China impact
Compounding the difficulties is a volatile global situation, with the US-China trade war, protests in Hong Kong and now the coronavirus denting Indian exports. Last week, India’s Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC) warned that the near shutdown of business in greater China had threatened to delay payments to suppliers. The situation had a negative effect on morale at IIJS Signature, as some 35% to 40% of India’s gem and jewelry export business is with Hong Kong and mainland China, according to figures from the GJEPC.
While it’s too early to assess the full impact, “let’s assume it’s really bad and the next six months will be challenging for the Far East,” Milan Choksi warned.
However, India remains in a strong position on the global stage amid the turbulence, noted Abhishek Sand, a partner at Jaipur-based jewelry manufacturer Savio Jewellery. It enjoys a good relationship with the US and is likely to increase its trade with America, Sand explained. Meanwhile, some Chinese jewelry manufacturers are moving operations to India because of lower US tariffs and the coronavirus, he reported.
“There’s a liking of the American government toward India,” Sand noted. Trump doesn’t have a trade war with India, he stressed.
Source: DCLA

Petra Sales Up, Prices Down

Petra Diamonds Operations Petra Diamonds reported increased sales for FY 2024, despite weak market conditions. The UK based miner said it ha...