The Diamond Market Has Changed, Could This Be the Time to Buy?

 

The diamond market is going through one of the most significant periods of change in recent decades. A combination of economic pressures, changing consumer behaviour, increased competition from laboratory-grown diamonds and a prolonged correction in diamond prices has created opportunities for buyers that would have been difficult to imagine only a few years ago.

For consumers, this raises an important question:

Could now be the time to buy the diamond you have always wanted?

The answer depends on what you are buying, but there is no question that today’s market offers buyers an opportunity to access diamonds at substantially different price levels from the past.

Economic Conditions Have Changed the Diamond Market

Diamonds are not immune to the broader economy.

Higher interest rates, increased living costs, weaker consumer confidence and pressure on household budgets have all affected discretionary spending, including luxury jewellery. At the same time, retailers and dealers have had to manage inventory more carefully as demand has changed.

But the diamond market is facing another major structural change: the rapid growth of laboratory-grown diamonds.

Laboratory-grown diamonds have the same basic chemical and physical characteristics as natural diamonds, but they can be produced at scale. The resulting price competition has dramatically changed consumer expectations.

Recent market reporting highlights just how far laboratory-grown diamond prices have fallen, with wholesale prices in some segments reaching around US$100 per carat.

Natural diamonds have also experienced significant price pressure. Rough diamond prices have fallen sharply, with Anglo American’s CEO recently acknowledging that the industry underestimated the competitive threat posed by laboratory-grown diamonds.

This does not mean every diamond has fallen by the same amount. Diamonds are not commodities where one price applies to every stone. Shape, carat weight, colour, clarity, cut, fluorescence, proportions, provenance, certification and overall appearance can make enormous differences to value.

That is precisely why expert advice matters.

Falling Prices Can Create Opportunity

For someone who has been considering purchasing a diamond, a falling market can be an opportunity rather than a reason to stay away.

When prices are under pressure, buyers can sometimes find exceptional diamonds at considerably more attractive prices than they could previously.

But there is an important distinction:

A cheap diamond is not necessarily a bargain.

The real opportunity is finding a high-quality diamond at a price that represents genuine value.

This is where diamond knowledge becomes critical.

A stone that appears inexpensive may have compromises in cut, proportions, clarity, colour, fluorescence or other characteristics that affect its beauty and value. Two diamonds with apparently similar specifications can look very different and have very different market values.

The challenge for consumers is therefore not simply finding the lowest price.

It is finding the right diamond at the right price.

Natural or Laboratory-Grown, Know What You Are Buying

Today’s consumer has more choice than ever.

A natural diamond represents a geological creation that formed deep within the earth over millions or even billions of years. A laboratory-grown diamond is created using advanced technology and has essentially the same chemical composition and crystal structure as a natural diamond.

Neither choice should be made simply because one is cheaper.

The right choice depends on what the diamond means to you, your budget, your priorities and what you expect from the purchase.

And with laboratory-grown diamond prices falling so dramatically, consumers need particularly good advice about pricing and long-term value.

Understanding what you are buying is more important than ever.

This Is Where the DCLA Diamond Exchange Can Help

For anyone considering buying, selling, upgrading or trading a diamond, the Diamond Certification Laboratory of Australia (DCLA) in Sydney provides access to an extraordinary depth of diamond expertise.

DCLA is Australia’s internationally accredited diamond grading laboratory and provides independent certification for both natural and laboratory-grown diamonds. Its Sydney laboratory works with buyers, sellers, jewellers, insurers and the wider diamond trade.

The DCLA’s expertise extends far beyond simply looking at a certificate.

Its founders and team have experience across the diamond industry, including rough diamonds, cutting and polishing, trading, grading, certification and jewellery. That industry knowledge provides an important perspective when assessing a diamond’s characteristics and market position.

More Than a Certificate

A diamond certificate tells you what a diamond is. Expertise helps you understand what that information means.

The DCLA can help consumers understand the differences between diamonds and identify the characteristics that can make one stone a better purchase than another.

Its diamond search service allows buyers to consider diamonds by shape, carat, colour, clarity, cut, fluorescence, laboratory certification and budget helping turn what can otherwise be an overwhelming purchase into an informed decision.

And for the diamond trade, DCLA has become a trusted resource when jewellers and dealers need independent grading, verification, valuation or professional assistance.

The Go-To Resource for Diamond Knowledge

The diamond industry is changing rapidly.

Natural diamond prices have been under pressure. Laboratory-grown diamonds have transformed the market. Consumers have more choices, more information and potentially greater buying power than they have had for many years.

But greater choice also creates greater complexity.

This is not necessarily the time to buy the cheapest diamond. It may be the time to buy the best diamond you can find at the right price.

That requires knowledge.

From mining and rough diamonds through to cutting and polishing, grading, certification and jewellery, the DCLA brings together decades of industry experience under one roof.

For consumers looking for a diamond, jewellers sourcing stones, or members of the trade who need professional advice, the DCLA Diamond Exchange in Sydney is a place where knowledge, experience and independent expertise can make a genuine difference.

In a changing diamond market, having an expert on your side could be the most valuable part of the purchase.

Visit the DCLA Diamond Certification Laboratory of Australia

Diamond prices vary significantly according to individual characteristics, market conditions and certification. A fall in general market prices does not mean every diamond has fallen by the same percentage. Professional assessment is recommended before purchasing or selling a diamond.

Natural Diamonds Face a Defining Period of Change and Opportunity

 

The natural diamond industry is entering a crucial period of transformation, with market leaders highlighting the key forces that will shape demand, supply and consumer confidence over the next five years.

According to analysis from De Beers, rebuilding demand for natural diamonds will depend on several important industry priorities, including stronger marketing, clearer differentiation from lab grown diamonds and a more balanced supply environment.

Marketing Remains Critical for Natural Diamond Demand

De Beers believes effective marketing will play a central role in restoring consumer desire for natural diamonds. After a period of changing consumer behaviour and economic uncertainty, the industry must continue to communicate the unique emotional value, rarity and enduring legacy of natural diamonds.

Building a stronger connection with younger consumers will be essential to ensuring natural diamonds maintain their position as symbols of love, commitment and achievement.

Lab Grown Diamond Pricing Faces Growing Pressure

The rapid growth of synthetic lab grown diamonds has created a new competitive landscape for the diamond industry.

However, current retail margins on lab grown diamonds are expected to face increasing pressure as competition expands and production continues to rise. As prices decline, the industry believes consumers will increasingly focus on understanding the differences between natural diamonds and laboratory created alternatives.

Differentiation Becomes Key to Consumer Confidence

Clear education and transparency will be vital for the future of the diamond market.

Natural diamonds are formed over billions of years beneath the earth’s surface, while lab grown diamonds are created through technological processes in controlled environments. Ensuring consumers understand these differences will be important in maintaining confidence and value perception.

Independent grading and certification from recognised laboratories such as DCLA will continue to play an important role in providing consumers with trust and assurance when purchasing natural diamonds.

Declining Rough Diamond Supply Could Support Long Term Market Balance

Another major factor shaping the future of natural diamonds is declining global rough diamond production.

With several major mines reaching maturity and fewer large discoveries entering production, supply is expected to reduce over the medium to long term. A tighter supply environment could help support a healthier balance between availability and demand.

Russia Introduces New Rough Diamond Export Duty

Russia is set to introduce an 8% export duty on rough diamonds weighing 0.45 carats or more from September 1.

The new measure, announced through a government decree, adds another layer of complexity to the global rough diamond supply chain. Russia remains one of the world’s largest diamond producers, meaning changes to its export policies can influence international market dynamics.

AWDC Launches First Sale of Traceable Artisanal Diamonds from Congo

The Antwerp World Diamond Centre has completed its first sale of artisanally mined rough diamonds from the Democratic Republic of Congo through the OrigemA programme.

Established in 2022 as a partnership between Belgium and the DRC, OrigemA aims to connect small scale Congolese miners with international markets by providing fully traceable artisanal diamonds.

The programme is designed to improve market access for artisanal miners while ensuring they receive fair value for their production. The DRC accounts for a significant share of global artisanal diamond output, making responsible sourcing initiatives increasingly important for the future of the industry.

Petra Diamonds Faces Ongoing Industry Pressure

Petra Diamonds continues to experience the challenges affecting many mid tier diamond producers as the industry works through a prolonged period of market disruption.

Lower rough diamond prices, weaker luxury demand in key markets and increased competition from lab grown diamonds have created financial pressure across the sector.

The company’s restructuring challenges highlight the broader issues facing producers with concentrated operations and single commodity exposure. The coming years are expected to test the resilience of diamond miners as the industry adjusts to changing consumer demand and evolving market conditions.

The Future of Natural Diamonds

The next five years will be a defining period for the natural diamond industry.

Success will depend on strengthening consumer confidence, improving education, supporting responsible sourcing and reinforcing the unique value of natural diamonds.

While the market faces significant challenges, declining supply, stronger differentiation and renewed storytelling around natural diamonds could create the foundation for a more balanced and sustainable future.

Source: DCLA

Average US Engagement Ring Costs $6,750

The average price of a natural diamond engagement ring in the US last year was $6,750.

And the average size of the stone was 1.07 carats, according to a new report by the New York-based Natural Diamond Council.

It provides a detailed analysis of the shift to larger, higher quality diamonds in its downloadable 20-page Natural Diamond Trends: A 2024 Overview.

Round brilliants remain by far the most popular shapes in diamond jewelry, at 81.7 per cent, but that figure is slipping slightly. 

Among fancy shapes for all diamond jewelry, princess and cushion showed the biggest increases, albeit from a very low base (2.1 per cent and 1.0 per cent market share respectively).

The most common color for an engagement diamond was H and the most common clarity was SI1, with bridal representing 33 per cent of all natural diamond sales in the US. 

The average price of wedding sets increased 31 per cent in 2024, the report said.

“The increase was mainly due to a rise in the average size of diamonds and a notable change in the type of metal used.”

The average price of natural diamond jewelry sold across all product categories grew 2.7% to $2,360 in 2024.

The report, the latest in a series uncovering the trends, origins and impacts of natural diamonds, was jointly produced with Tenoris.

Source: IDEX

Natural Diamond Council makes marketing push

The Diamond Producers’ Association (DPA), established only five years ago by a coalition of diamond miners including De Beers and Alrosa, has relaunched as the Natural Diamond Council.

In addition to continuing to advertise natural diamonds as the DPA did previously, the council is also hoping to reach younger consumers by producing catchy editorial content on trends and innovations in diamond jewelry and the heritage of natural diamonds.

The rebranding comes at a difficult time for the diamond sector, with the economic fallout from the coronavirus pandemic depressing demand and prices.

“The current economic climate creates unprecedented challenges for the luxury industry. But, as the climate improves, natural diamonds will connect stronger than ever before,” said Natural Diamond Council CEO, David Kellie in a release. “Consumers will have a greater respect for all things natural and seek brands that have an honest mission to be truly sustainable. They’ll be purchasing luxury goods with a greater meaning, particularly those celebrating connections between friends and loved ones. We need to speak to the younger audience in a different way and we’re delighted to have brought in a number of partners that will contribute to the new world of natural diamonds we’re creating.”

The website will offer coverage under six categories: Epic Diamonds, Hollywood & Pop Culture, Love & Diamonds, Style & Innovation, Diamonds 101 and Inside the Diamond World. The council has also started a new, biannual trend report written by style experts, forecasting diamond jewelry trends, and incorporating styling tips.

In addition, the DPA’s Real is Rare, Real is a Diamond campaign will be replaced with the council’s new branding: “Only Natural Diamonds” (OND).

“Our new digital platforms will inspire and inform consumers globally about the values and heritage of natural diamonds, as well as promoting the significant innovation happening throughout the world of diamond jewelry,” added NDC’s managing director, Kristina Buckley Kayel. “The younger audience is clearly engaged and inspired when we present ourselves with authority in the digital world. It’s our aim to be number one across all digital platforms in our industry and our ambitious plans reflect these goals.”

The Natural Diamond Council will also aim to educate consumers on the sustainability and ethical practices of diamond producers, as well as everything they need to know when buying diamond jewelry.

In a release, the organization said the relaunch reflects the collective commitment of its members, Alrosa, De Beers, Dominion Diamonds, Lucara Diamond, Petra Diamonds, Murowa Diamonds, and Rio Tinto, to the growth of the industry beyond the current economic crisis.

“Our mission is to educate consumers on the industry and positive social contribution diamonds make to the world today,” said Stephen Lussier, Chairman of the NDC. “Our members are committed to these goals and the launch of the NDC marks an exciting step on this path.”

Visit www.naturaldiamonds.com for more information.

Source: DCLA

Natural Diamond Council makes marketing push

The Diamond Producers’ Association (DPA), established only five years ago by a coalition of diamond miners including De Beers and Alrosa, has relaunched as the Natural Diamond Council.

In addition to continuing to advertise natural diamonds as the DPA did previously, the council is also hoping to reach younger consumers by producing catchy editorial content on trends and innovations in diamond jewelry and the heritage of natural diamonds.

The rebranding comes at a difficult time for the diamond sector, with the economic fallout from the coronavirus pandemic depressing demand and prices.

“The current economic climate creates unprecedented challenges for the luxury industry. But, as the climate improves, natural diamonds will connect stronger than ever before,” said Natural Diamond Council CEO, David Kellie in a release. “Consumers will have a greater respect for all things natural and seek brands that have an honest mission to be truly sustainable. They’ll be purchasing luxury goods with a greater meaning, particularly those celebrating connections between friends and loved ones. We need to speak to the younger audience in a different way and we’re delighted to have brought in a number of partners that will contribute to the new world of natural diamonds we’re creating.”

The website will offer coverage under six categories: Epic Diamonds, Hollywood & Pop Culture, Love & Diamonds, Style & Innovation, Diamonds 101 and Inside the Diamond World. The council has also started a new, biannual trend report written by style experts, forecasting diamond jewelry trends, and incorporating styling tips.

In addition, the DPA’s Real is Rare, Real is a Diamond campaign will be replaced with the council’s new branding: “Only Natural Diamonds” (OND).

“Our new digital platforms will inspire and inform consumers globally about the values and heritage of natural diamonds, as well as promoting the significant innovation happening throughout the world of diamond jewelry,” added NDC’s managing director, Kristina Buckley Kayel. “The younger audience is clearly engaged and inspired when we present ourselves with authority in the digital world. It’s our aim to be number one across all digital platforms in our industry and our ambitious plans reflect these goals.”

The Natural Diamond Council will also aim to educate consumers on the sustainability and ethical practices of diamond producers, as well as everything they need to know when buying diamond jewelry.

In a release, the organization said the relaunch reflects the collective commitment of its members, Alrosa, De Beers, Dominion Diamonds, Lucara Diamond, Petra Diamonds, Murowa Diamonds, and Rio Tinto, to the growth of the industry beyond the current economic crisis.

“Our mission is to educate consumers on the industry and positive social contribution diamonds make to the world today,” said Stephen Lussier, Chairman of the NDC. “Our members are committed to these goals and the launch of the NDC marks an exciting step on this path.”

Visit www.naturaldiamonds.com for more information.

Source: DCLA

Everything Changes, Some Things Stay the Same

The diamond and jewelry trade tends to be reactive rather than proactive.
That was clear during the recent conference season, with the World Federation of Diamond Bourses (WFDB), the International Diamond Manufacturers Association (IDMA), the World Jewellery Confederation (CIBJO) and the World Diamond Council (WDC) all holding their annual meetings in October.

Much of the discussion, according to reports from the meetings, was centered on how the trade should relate to synthetic diamonds. It’s a difficult question following the recent decision by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to expand the definition of “diamond” to include those grown in a laboratory.

How does that apply to invoicing, advertising or grading reports? Having reached equal footing with mined diamonds in the eyes of the FTC, should lab-grown stones be allowed on the bourse trading floors? Of course not. And the trade restated its position that the use of the word “diamond,” without any qualifiers before it, refers to a natural stone by default.

But language isn’t really the issue. Behind the debate lies a deep concern about the growing acceptance of synthetics — both in retail and within the trade. De Beers’ entry into the market has played a significant role in that development, giving others a green light to follow suit.

Forget De Beers’ claim that it is helping differentiate natural from synthetic diamonds through pricing. The company is encouraging demand for a product that will ultimately eat into the natural-diamond market. We’re seeing that already, with more retailers, such as Macy’s and JCPenney, convinced that consumers will “grow in love” with synthetic-diamond jewelry.

The trade’s leadership claims it was blindsided by De Beers and the FTC. But its efforts at this point to engage with the FTC to revoke the decision will ultimately prove to be a case of too little, too late.

Rather, we must recognize that the industry trade groups that met in Mumbai, along with CIBJO, which met in Colombia, failed their constituents. So did the Diamond Producers Association (DPA), of which De Beers holds the current chairmanship.

Why was the natural-diamond-industry lobby ineffective a year ago — if active at all — while synthetics producers were convincing the FTC to include them in its definition? Where is the outrage from DPA members over their chairman actively working against the group’s mandate to promote natural diamonds as real and rare?

The industry’s reactive approach to the synthetics issue signals a need to update its strategy. Perhaps an initiative to combine the roles of the WFDB and IDMA into one organization would bring them new energy and purpose.

For now, the inability to change leadership at these organizations suggests the rest of the trade sees them as ineffective. As the WFDB and IDMA begin another term with the same leadership and a new committee working to spread the WFDB’s influence, we urge trade groups to be more proactive in dealing with the many challenges facing the natural-diamond market.

Source: diamonds.net

Everything Changes, Some Things Stay the Same

The diamond and jewelry trade tends to be reactive rather than proactive.
That was clear during the recent conference season, with the World Federation of Diamond Bourses (WFDB), the International Diamond Manufacturers Association (IDMA), the World Jewellery Confederation (CIBJO) and the World Diamond Council (WDC) all holding their annual meetings in October.

Much of the discussion, according to reports from the meetings, was centered on how the trade should relate to synthetic diamonds. It’s a difficult question following the recent decision by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to expand the definition of “diamond” to include those grown in a laboratory.

How does that apply to invoicing, advertising or grading reports? Having reached equal footing with mined diamonds in the eyes of the FTC, should lab-grown stones be allowed on the bourse trading floors? Of course not. And the trade restated its position that the use of the word “diamond,” without any qualifiers before it, refers to a natural stone by default.

But language isn’t really the issue. Behind the debate lies a deep concern about the growing acceptance of synthetics — both in retail and within the trade. De Beers’ entry into the market has played a significant role in that development, giving others a green light to follow suit.

Forget De Beers’ claim that it is helping differentiate natural from synthetic diamonds through pricing. The company is encouraging demand for a product that will ultimately eat into the natural-diamond market. We’re seeing that already, with more retailers, such as Macy’s and JCPenney, convinced that consumers will “grow in love” with synthetic-diamond jewelry.

The trade’s leadership claims it was blindsided by De Beers and the FTC. But its efforts at this point to engage with the FTC to revoke the decision will ultimately prove to be a case of too little, too late.

Rather, we must recognize that the industry trade groups that met in Mumbai, along with CIBJO, which met in Colombia, failed their constituents. So did the Diamond Producers Association (DPA), of which De Beers holds the current chairmanship.

Why was the natural-diamond-industry lobby ineffective a year ago — if active at all — while synthetics producers were convincing the FTC to include them in its definition? Where is the outrage from DPA members over their chairman actively working against the group’s mandate to promote natural diamonds as real and rare?

The industry’s reactive approach to the synthetics issue signals a need to update its strategy. Perhaps an initiative to combine the roles of the WFDB and IDMA into one organization would bring them new energy and purpose.

For now, the inability to change leadership at these organizations suggests the rest of the trade sees them as ineffective. As the WFDB and IDMA begin another term with the same leadership and a new committee working to spread the WFDB’s influence, we urge trade groups to be more proactive in dealing with the many challenges facing the natural-diamond market.

Source: diamonds.net