Argyle revenues soar to decade high as mine closure nears

Rio Tinto’s fading Argyle diamond mine looks set to go out on a high, after posting its best financial performance in years.

Diamond markets are notoriously opaque, and Argyle’s performance cannot be gleaned through the financial results Rio reports every six months.

But new filings with the Australian Securities and Exchange Commission (ASIC) reveal revenues at Argyle, which is scheduled to close in 2020, surged to their highest levels in a decade in 2018.

The $370.6 million of revenue generated was 26 per cent higher than in 2017 and was the highest revenue reported by Argyle since 2008.

The improved financial performance was not constrained to revenue; the $148.4 million of cash flow from operations was virtually double the 2017 result, almost quadruple the 2016 result and the best since 2015.

The revenue and cash flow surge came, perversely, in a year when Argyle processed 10 per cent more ore than in 2017, but produced 18 per cent fewer diamonds; a situation that normally implies higher unit costs and poorer financial performance.

It is understood the big increase in revenue was driven by higher sales volumes in 2018 compared to previous years.

Revenue was also boosted by a stronger US currency and improving prices for the pink diamonds Argyle produces, which are tipped to enjoy greater scarcity value as the mine’s closure draws near.

Higher diamond sales in a year when Argyle’s diamond production slumped highlights the sort of opacity that makes diamond markets difficult for investors to predict.

Diamond production likely to be lower
While Argyle’s closure in 2020 appears certain, it is unclear whether Rio has built a sufficient war chest of pink diamonds to continue its annual pink diamond tender beyond the end of the mine’s life.

Rio keeps diamond pricing confidential, but within the past year the company’s diamond boss, Arnaud Soirat, has pointed to recent public auctions in which Argyle pink diamonds sold for more than $US1 million per carat.

Argyle’s revenue and cash flow surge belied the $128.6 million loss before tax that was reported to ASIC last week by the Rio subsidiary that owns the mine.

That loss was heavily influenced by a $145.4 million non-cash expense related to the closure of the mine.

Diamond production at Argyle looks set to be lower again in 2019 if the first quarter is any guide; production in the three months to March 31 was 22 per cent lower than in the same period of 2019, and 13 per cent lower than in the final three months of 2018.

The rare insight to Argyle’s financial performance comes as Rio directors and executive management fly into Western Australia this week for the company’s annual meeting of Australian shareholders on Thursday.

Chairman Simon Thompson has urged shareholders to vote against a resolution put forward by climate campaigners, which would compel Rio to set targets for reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

The resolution explicitly calls for reduction targets linked to scope 3 emissions; the emissions generated by the companies Rio sells its products to.

Such a target would include Asian steelmakers, which create significant emissions when they blend Rio’s flagship product, Australian iron ore, with coking coal to make steel.

Mr Thompson has argued that emissions generated by such customers are beyond the control of Rio, and therefore the company cannot set such targets.

Source: afr.com

Argyle revenues soar to decade high as mine closure nears

Rio Tinto’s fading Argyle diamond mine looks set to go out on a high, after posting its best financial performance in years.

Diamond markets are notoriously opaque, and Argyle’s performance cannot be gleaned through the financial results Rio reports every six months.

But new filings with the Australian Securities and Exchange Commission (ASIC) reveal revenues at Argyle, which is scheduled to close in 2020, surged to their highest levels in a decade in 2018.

The $370.6 million of revenue generated was 26 per cent higher than in 2017 and was the highest revenue reported by Argyle since 2008.

The improved financial performance was not constrained to revenue; the $148.4 million of cash flow from operations was virtually double the 2017 result, almost quadruple the 2016 result and the best since 2015.

The revenue and cash flow surge came, perversely, in a year when Argyle processed 10 per cent more ore than in 2017, but produced 18 per cent fewer diamonds; a situation that normally implies higher unit costs and poorer financial performance.

It is understood the big increase in revenue was driven by higher sales volumes in 2018 compared to previous years.

Revenue was also boosted by a stronger US currency and improving prices for the pink diamonds Argyle produces, which are tipped to enjoy greater scarcity value as the mine’s closure draws near.

Higher diamond sales in a year when Argyle’s diamond production slumped highlights the sort of opacity that makes diamond markets difficult for investors to predict.

Diamond production likely to be lower
While Argyle’s closure in 2020 appears certain, it is unclear whether Rio has built a sufficient war chest of pink diamonds to continue its annual pink diamond tender beyond the end of the mine’s life.

Rio keeps diamond pricing confidential, but within the past year the company’s diamond boss, Arnaud Soirat, has pointed to recent public auctions in which Argyle pink diamonds sold for more than $US1 million per carat.

Argyle’s revenue and cash flow surge belied the $128.6 million loss before tax that was reported to ASIC last week by the Rio subsidiary that owns the mine.

That loss was heavily influenced by a $145.4 million non-cash expense related to the closure of the mine.

Diamond production at Argyle looks set to be lower again in 2019 if the first quarter is any guide; production in the three months to March 31 was 22 per cent lower than in the same period of 2019, and 13 per cent lower than in the final three months of 2018.

The rare insight to Argyle’s financial performance comes as Rio directors and executive management fly into Western Australia this week for the company’s annual meeting of Australian shareholders on Thursday.

Chairman Simon Thompson has urged shareholders to vote against a resolution put forward by climate campaigners, which would compel Rio to set targets for reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

The resolution explicitly calls for reduction targets linked to scope 3 emissions; the emissions generated by the companies Rio sells its products to.

Such a target would include Asian steelmakers, which create significant emissions when they blend Rio’s flagship product, Australian iron ore, with coking coal to make steel.

Mr Thompson has argued that emissions generated by such customers are beyond the control of Rio, and therefore the company cannot set such targets.

Source: afr.com

How do you like your diamonds?

Diamonds that could only just fit in your hand have been unearthed in Botswana recently so overnights polished up their knowledge on what modern day diamond mining involves. 

The modern day diamond competes with synthetic diamonds but Roy Cohen from the Diamond Grading Laboratory of Australia reckons they're as popular as ever. 

How does the cut change that value, what are Australian diamonds like and where can you buy the cheapest diamond in the world? Find out on this weeks talking topic about Diamonds. 

listen to the show here:  https://www.abc.net.au/radio/sydney/programs/overnights/diamonds/11075702

How do you like your diamonds?

Diamonds that could only just fit in your hand have been unearthed in Botswana recently so overnights polished up their knowledge on what modern day diamond mining involves. 

The modern day diamond competes with synthetic diamonds but Roy Cohen from the Diamond Grading Laboratory of Australia reckons they're as popular as ever. 

How does the cut change that value, what are Australian diamonds like and where can you buy the cheapest diamond in the world? Find out on this weeks talking topic about Diamonds. 

listen to the show here:  https://www.abc.net.au/radio/sydney/programs/overnights/diamonds/11075702

Diamond Miners Push Back on Ethics Claims

The major diamond miners have weighed in on the debate over which diamonds are more ethical, claiming their production uses less than one-third of the energy it takes to create a diamond in a lab.

The operations of companies that make up the Diamond Producers Association (DPA) emitted an average of 160 kilograms of carbon dioxide (CO2) per 1-carat of polished diamonds produced in 2016, according to a study commissioned by the DPA and carried out by Trucost ESG Analysis, which is part of S&P Global. That compared to the estimated greenhouse gas emissions of 511 kilograms of CO2 for the average 1-carat lab-grown polished stone.

A debate has ensued in recent years over which diamond is more environmentally friendly (or harmful), with many lab-grown-diamond companies claiming to have the greener product in their advertising. In April, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) warned several synthetics producers against using claims such as “eco-friendly,” “eco-conscious” or “sustainable” without qualification.

“This independent research report breaks outdated stereotypes and misconceptions and identifies the next set of challenges that must be met to continue to evolve and improve as an industry,” said DPA CEO Jean-Marc Lieberherr in a statement on Thursday.

The DPA members have set goals to reduce their carbon footprint, while the DPA will monitor their progress in achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.

The report, titled “The Socioeconomic and Environmental Impact of Large-Scale Diamond Mining,” highlights the benefits to employees of DPA members, the impact those companies collectively have on the communities in which they operate and their environmental stewardship.

Together, the miners generate more than $16 billion in net socioeconomic and environmental benefits through their operations, Trucost reported.

Despite significant progress toward responsible and transparent practices over the past 15 years, the current reality of the diamond-mining sector remains largely unknown, the authors noted. “This report provides access into a highly scrutinized, yet largely misunderstood sector,” the report added.

The DPA consists of seven companies, with Alrosa, De Beers, Rio Tinto and Petra Diamonds participating in the study. Dominion Diamond Mines, Lucara Diamonds and Murowa Diamonds are the other members.

The Lab Grown Diamond Association did not reply to a request for comment from Rapaport News by press time.

Image: Rough and polished diamonds. (Diamond Producers Association)

Source: Diamonds.net

Diamond Miners Push Back on Ethics Claims

The major diamond miners have weighed in on the debate over which diamonds are more ethical, claiming their production uses less than one-third of the energy it takes to create a diamond in a lab.

The operations of companies that make up the Diamond Producers Association (DPA) emitted an average of 160 kilograms of carbon dioxide (CO2) per 1-carat of polished diamonds produced in 2016, according to a study commissioned by the DPA and carried out by Trucost ESG Analysis, which is part of S&P Global. That compared to the estimated greenhouse gas emissions of 511 kilograms of CO2 for the average 1-carat lab-grown polished stone.

A debate has ensued in recent years over which diamond is more environmentally friendly (or harmful), with many lab-grown-diamond companies claiming to have the greener product in their advertising. In April, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) warned several synthetics producers against using claims such as “eco-friendly,” “eco-conscious” or “sustainable” without qualification.

“This independent research report breaks outdated stereotypes and misconceptions and identifies the next set of challenges that must be met to continue to evolve and improve as an industry,” said DPA CEO Jean-Marc Lieberherr in a statement on Thursday.

The DPA members have set goals to reduce their carbon footprint, while the DPA will monitor their progress in achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.

The report, titled “The Socioeconomic and Environmental Impact of Large-Scale Diamond Mining,” highlights the benefits to employees of DPA members, the impact those companies collectively have on the communities in which they operate and their environmental stewardship.

Together, the miners generate more than $16 billion in net socioeconomic and environmental benefits through their operations, Trucost reported.

Despite significant progress toward responsible and transparent practices over the past 15 years, the current reality of the diamond-mining sector remains largely unknown, the authors noted. “This report provides access into a highly scrutinized, yet largely misunderstood sector,” the report added.

The DPA consists of seven companies, with Alrosa, De Beers, Rio Tinto and Petra Diamonds participating in the study. Dominion Diamond Mines, Lucara Diamonds and Murowa Diamonds are the other members.

The Lab Grown Diamond Association did not reply to a request for comment from Rapaport News by press time.

Image: Rough and polished diamonds. (Diamond Producers Association)

Source: Diamonds.net

Gold & Silver - Historical Vehicles To Protect Your Wealth w/ Jayant Bhandari

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wv4Egi-bzlY&feature=youtu.be